Monday, 29 December 2008

Barack Obama and 'Community Organisation.'

This video here, shows some rare clips of Adolf Hitler that appear to validate the Christian claims of his time that he was 'possessed by satan himself'. As did all Hitler's acts. This video also compares Hitler and Obama and is another to suggest that Obama, who will be head of the free world and his 'New World Order' is smoother, more sophisticated, and in appearance, more calculating than Hitler.

While the candidates were running for the presidency, it was suggested:

'Jesus is a community organiser, Pilate was a governor.' This is being said over in America. Apparently to cast a slur on Palin for her office of governor in modern America. Susan Sarandon appears to have been among those who started it off. The reaction to this has been that Jesus is the true Messiah, therefore not a worldly 'community organizer'. Jesus was not a politically motivated community organizer ( as Barack appears to be- he is also a political radical). Barabas was. ( Barabus was also a radical). When Jesus was before Pontious Pilate, the latter asked the crowd of they'd like to have one of them released. The ranting crowd shouted for Barabus.

Here, Barack Obama mentions 'Muslim faith'. He makes claims to different faiths. He had instruction in Islam.

A note on Barack's "community organization" skills from a blogger here, who feels that Obama's respect for satanist community organisers of the past is suspect. Barack Obama further respects satanists who refer to satan as 'Lucifer' (satan's name before he fell from heaven). This blogger complains about Barack being edited and defended by the press whenever they feel it's necessary. (I do not share this bloggers views about the evangelical Church. I support all true Christian believers in Jesus, I love His Church.)

People who refer to satan as still being 'Lucifer' are mistaken. ( Exception the one incidence where he addressed by the prophet Isaiah as Lucifer. Once . Here, go figure.) Here's a dictionnary definition providing scriptures for you to check. According to the bible, satan is fallen, condemned, punished, humiliated, cast out of heaven entirely; since man was expelled from the garden of Eden, he's tied to this world's time, the bible explains that after creating havoc in the last days he will be bound for a thousand years; at the end of the world's time, time as the world knows it, he is permanently punished and locked away. He has no future, he is powerless before Jesus; since he fell he has always been referred to as 'satan'. In many bible translations, the apostles don't even give a capital letter to the beginning of his name.

Here is a current discourse about Barack and his community organization.

Here's an interesting clip from Hannity and co, 'Obama's Radicalism' showing his radical connections . Barack Obama probably got into Harvard University thanks to recommendations from Islam extremists, and there is more info on his 'community organization' training. All radical extremists with far out views. Part 1 here.
And Part 2. and Part 3. and Part 4.

n.b. when watching this, bear in mind that Jesus is indeed a liberator for the oppressed (there is one point in the video where this is denied). Don't let anyone tell you different. Click here for the scripture.
Jesus is Not a politically motivated liberator, no, never has been and never will be. He is the same yesterday, today and forever. He came to set us free from sin and death and the kingdom of satan's destruction.

'King James Bible

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised..'

A lot of people didn't like his message. They wanted a Messiah King who'd set them free from their various oppressors through political means; the Sanhedrin wanted someone who'd free them from the Romans, many others wanted a King who'd use political force to free them from the Roman's and the Sanhedrin alike. ..

That wasn't Jesus' mission.

Here are a number of videos relating to the 'Saul Alinsky' issue.

Sunday, 28 December 2008

Past, present, and questions


Here is a helpful external link for people interested in end time events and Christian 'historicist' teaching, to give people an outline of the three 'end time' views, 'preterist', 'historicist', and 'futurist'. from the historicist perspective.

I personally believe that the book of Revelation has been fulfilled throughout the history of Christianity and continues to be fulfilled, and will be further fulfilled in the future. :-) A number of bible prophecies in respect of the end times have several fulfillments.

It is thought that the Roman empire and its history is one of the four empires in the four empire prophecies of Daniel.

Two different main schools of thought are being identified by some in respect of the 'son of perdition' (often referred to as the 'Antichrist'). 'The historicist view', and 'The futurist view.' The definitions seem a little clumsy, but they're being used .

The historical view points specifically to Rome and the Papacy.

Numerous Popes of the past have been heavily corrupted
.


An outline of the corrupted acitivites of past Popes here, and here ( an essay on estimates of the amount of Christians killed by the Papacy in the middle ages and later) .


The activities of Rome in the earlier years after the Lord Jesus Christ's time on earth and behaviours of corrupted early Popes, and those who followed their orders, gave rise to the most serious accusation there is about Papacy generally, which has been proposed by many scholars ever since. ( The accusation that the Popes, or at least certain Popes, are the powerful 'antichrist' whose activities are described in the bible book of Revelation.)

The Vatican has advocated unrighteous governance many times. I thas also engaged in politics encouraging a New World order/ One World Government many times.

The 20th century saw rising fascism in Rome as the politically motivated City of the era demonstrated enthusiasm for the World Order 'proposed' by Adolf Hitler. Much of the Vatican City area is heavily decorated with fascist associated signs and symbols , try checking it out next time you visit.

Opponents of the Papal order throughout the ages have not always been selfless in motive; far from it.

Here, an essay investigating the question 'What is the abomination of desolation?' These authors appear to advocate 'watching and praying' in the last days according to the instructions in scripture. They investigate the four empire prophecies of Daniel.

They remind us that a prophetic word from the Lord can speak about more than one situation. They suggest that we can infer that a relevant Daniel prophecy may refer to more than one desecration of the Jerusalem temple (and attacks on Jerusalem and Israel).

They suggest that certain 'end time prophecies' in the bible may have numerous fulfillments

"Many scholars recognize duality ('many layers' when in comes to prophecy and 'world prophecy' would be perhaps be a better way to put it) in Bible prophecy, meaning that many prophecies have an initial fulfillment as well as a later one. Jesus Himself alluded to this principle when He cited the prophecy of "the 'abomination of desolation,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet" (Matthew 24:15). The Jews of His day well understood that Antiochus Epiphanes had desecrated the temple, fulfilling this Daniel prophecy some 200 years earlier. Yet Jesus made it clear this prophecy would be fulfilled again....... "

The desecration of the Temple in Jerusalem that these authors mention came before Jesus' reference to the 'abomination of desolation' that Daniel had spoken of, so it can't be suggested that the Daniel prophecy was entirely fulfilled by the work of Epiphanes, obviously. It can be suggested that the 'abomination of desolation' that Jesus referred to infers the presence and work of more than one tyrannical demagogue figure.

The Lord Jesus' words suggest that the Daniel prophecies would be entirely fulfilled after the gospel had been preached to all the nations (which it now has been).

The reference to the 'son of perdition' in the Thessalonians scripture, the 'man of lawlessness' who is to emerge in that last days, appears to refer to one specific figure, though many of similar disposition apparently will precede him. It appears to refer to one penultimate ( world significant) demagogue figure, who will 'sit in the temple of God, proclaiming that he is God.'

According to regular interpretation of scripture, in the 'end times' the temple will be desecrated, and there will be terrible tribulation in Jerusalem and in the rest of the world and persecution of Israel and the Church. 'Let them that are in Judea flee to the mountains'....

Here, another essay by the authors cited above, 'when will these things happen?'







Both historicist and futurist 'views' state that there will be the second coming of Jesus as defined by scripture, the timing of which 'Only the father knows'.

First the Thessalonians scripture again.

"Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers, not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by some prophecy, report or letter supposed to have come from us, saying that the day of the Lord has already come. Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come except that there be a falling away first and a man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God."

Here is the Thessalonians scripture in all its English translations .Here, here and here.

Most translations of the scripture quoted above state 'son of perdition' rather than 'man of lawlessness.' (This same 'son of perdition' is identified as 'man of lawlessness' in other bible scriptures.)

The 'historicist view':

This 'view' suggests that the 'son of perdition' is defined by Papacy and has therefore come and gone, ( some advocates say he is still with us in the form of the Pope.). It makes reference to specific corrupt Popes, who, it is suggested, represent the 'the son of perdition' more than others. Some of its roots lie in Lutheran teaching.

Commentary from the Methodist Wesley is also referred to. He recognized that the 'son of perdition' had not appeared yet, in his day, though certain corrupted Popes had come to the fore:

2:3 Unless the falling away - From the pure faith of the gospel, come first. This began even in the apostolic age. But the man of sin, the son of perdition - Eminently so called, is not come yet. However, in many respects, the Pope has an indisputable claim to those titles.

We can see that Wesley wanted the specific definition 'son of perdition' to apply to the Popes to the point that he was prepared to adapt scripture to fit his thesis. 'Eminently so called, is not come yet.' He effectively wrote: 'well it's true enough that the one penultimate false Messiah, the 'son of perdition' does not seem to be here yet, so let's treat the definition as a loose definition and treat Popes as the figure.'

Early proponents of the 'historic view' here. Various Popes are accused of having stated that they were supreme authority in place of Jesus Christ. A certain corrupted Pope is accused of having stated 'what am I, if I am not God?'

The 'futurist view':

There have been many antichrist figures in history. Many false Messiahs. ( People claiming to be Messiahs/Christs in place of Jesus are of course antichrist.) Many religious and political leaders, sinful men born of union between a man and a woman have claimed that they were Messiahs and the answer to the world's problems. Some have applied great brutality and stipulated that no one should trade without their approval.
Yet, at a time when other Revelation prophecies appear to be being fulfilled, there will be a penultimate false Messiah, the 'son of perdition', (often referred to as the 'Antichrist') who will force the status of a One World Government. A 'man of lawlessness' is to be revealed who 'opposes and exalts himself over everything that is called God or that is worshiped'..... ( see all the scriptures relating to this 'son of perdition'.) He will 'sit in the Temple of God, proclaiming that he is God.' There will have been a falling away in the Churches worldwide which will continue as people all over the world from all backgrounds ( all except those who remain faithful to Jesus) run out after the penultimate false Messiah, the 'son of perdition', (the 'Antichrist.')
The 'son of perdition' will deceive then turn on many.
'By peace he shall destroy many.'
There will be tribulation in the 'last days'.
At some point, the 'mark of the beast' or 'the number of his name' will be enforced.
( There is more to it all than this, see the bible and the discussions. This brief outline is just for the purposes of a comparison between two current 'views'.)

Many advocates of the 'historicist view' (the view as outlined above) appear to state that Popes are the 'man of lawlessness' / 'son of perdition' who 'set himself up in the Temple of God proclaiming that he was God'. If so, the Vatican Church of these Popes' era would need to be defined as the 'Temple of God.' (This would seem to be in conflict with the prophet Daniel's apparent reference to the Temple at Jerusalem).

They often suggest a certain Pope ( or the Papacy) might have fulfilled the one scripture:

'He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God'.

Many 'Historicist view' advocates suggest that the definition 'the son of perdition' applies to a collection of Popes, rather than just one man. 'The Papacy.' Some titles different Popes have used throughout the ages add up to six hundred threescore and six or thereabouts using types of deduction. Other historicists suggest it applies only to a few, the abusive Popes of history.

Earlier, we looked at how Emperor Neron Cesar's name adds up to six hundred three score and six (666) using certain types of deduction. We looked at the suggestion that the Roman Empire, those ancient persecutors of both Jews and Christians, somehow brought about the current world leadership state that is bringing in the New World Order. ( The global government).

The Thessalonians scripture defenition ( and other scripture defenitions related) does appear to apply to one man. Wesley admitted it. 'The son of perdition.' 'A man of lawlessness.' He will precede the second coming of Jesus and a rise at an apparently well defined time.
This 'one man' is referred to in several scriptures. The 'son of perdition.'


Throughout history there have been many antichrists. This is confirmed by the apostles who warn in the bible that ...

'1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last hour. Just as you heard that an antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have appeared. This is how we know it is the last hour.'

Over the past two thousand years there
have been many figures who have falsely claimed that they were Christs ( Messiahs) and many have forced people to submit to their various orders. (Including corrupt Popes.)

Barack Obama is in the process of achieving world governance, it is thought.

The Revelation scriptures seem to suggest that a 'son of perdition' ( 'Antichrist') will achieve world governance and will apparently head up a One World Government.

The scriptures suggest he will 'set himself up in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.'

Then there is the scripture: 'And he forces all, small and great, bond and free, rich and poor, ...' See the full scripture here.

This scripture strongly implies that the forcing of the mark of the beast will happen through a One World Government with control over people from all types of situations.


Many people see the 'Temple of God' specified in the Thessalonians scripture to mean the Temple in Jerusalem.

Receiving the 'mark of the beast' or 'the number of his name' as defined by the book of Revelation is a sign of definitive devotion to satan that will ensure that a person is rejected by God. The bible Revelation scripture is very clear on this.

'Historicist view' advocates suggest that the 'mark of the beast' is the bible's way of branding someone who submits to a corrupt order governed by an antichrist figure ( they often cite corrupted Popes). According to the 'historical view' the 'mark of the beast' ( or the 'number of his name') is not a physical mark placed on a person's right hand or forehead. Their reasoning is: Christians are described in the bible as having the seal of God upon them. This is a spiritual, not a visible, seal; therefore, advocates of the 'historical view' suggest, the 'mark of the beast' must be a spiritual mark merely. Rather than a physical and spiritual one.

The 'futurist view' proposes that the 'mark' of the beast is indeed a spiritual mark and specifies that the 'mark of the beast' or 'the number of his name' is a specific, physical, visible mark that people will receive on their foreheads and their hands, enforced via a One World government. An unmistakeable mark. A physical mark and a spiritual mark. A mark that will be enforced and consequently received by many people in contempt of the Leviticus scripture:
'You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead or make any marks upon you: I am the LORD".

The bible appears to specify one specific, irrefutable 'mark of the beast' that will be enforced globally in the 'last days.' The 'last days' as defined by the bible cover a two thousand year period.

One branch of the 'historicist view', since it concludes that Rome ( incorporating Roman Catholicism) is the definitive 'beast', and Pope's are the 'son of perdition', apparently implies that anyone who ever worshiped an idol which had been worked into the Catholic Church or a corrupted Pope wouldn't have been forgiven had they sought God's forgiveness through Jesus , which is surely false. It seems to suggest that everyone who ever submitted to the authority of a corrupt Pope, including all Priests and Bishops, somehow received the irrevocable ' mark of the beast.'

That branch of 'historicist view' proponents do not distinguish between the corrupted Popes of the Vatican and the remainder of the Catholic Church and loosely suggest that every member of the Catholic Church, via the Papacy, is by definition antichrist. Given the amount of genuine Christians in the modern Catholic Church, all with their own opinions, including opinions on awful historical Popes and other problems there have been, ( e.g. the idol worship that has got into the Catholic church and associated suspect spiritual manifestations, coteries and worse etc. ) such a suggestion is clearly incorrect and inappropriate.

Many Catholic Christians have come out against Obama.
Particularly in respect of the Infanticide issue. 'Mr. Obama's position is heartless.'


That branch of 'Historicist view' advocates either dismiss current events that seem to be happening in fulfillment of scripture prophecy such as the 'New World Order', ( Global governance) the coming 'cashless society' and the global warming crisis, or suggest that the biblical defined 'son of perdition' has nothing to do with end time events that apparently occur in fulfillment of Revelation prophecy, having already emerged a long time ago as the Papacy ( or, if pushed, one specific Pope.) They tend to ignore 'end time' events and current affairs.

Th 'historicist view' implies that one religious institution ( the Catholic Church) has had a monopoly on 'false Messiahs/false Christs'. That's surely false.


Corruption is not exclusive to the Catholic Church Institution. The Protestant Church Institution, (where as in the Catholic Church, there have been many sincere Christians who do not revere false leaders or idols ) has often practiced corruption.


It was founded not because Henry VIII was concerned about the 16th century malpractices and influences of Rome but because he wanted to commit adultery flagrantly and do away with everyone who stood in his way, beheading them all if necessary. Whatever Rome may have been rightfully accused of doing at the time, ( a great deal), the Church of England was founded in the spirit of adultery and rebellion by royal psychopath and politician Henry VIII.

Jesus said: 'whoever divorces his except for infidelity, and marries another, commits adultery.' How hard was that for leaders from either denomination to understand.

The true Church, born again believers in Christ Jesus, who obey his commandments, are made innocent by Jesus, being forgiven by God through Jesus.

Neither formal Protestant nor Catholic Church Institutions have an innocent history. Far from it. Nor do any other religious institutions. The Lord Jesus, in the parable about the 'wheat and the tares', explained that false Christians and groups of Christians would spring up among the true, and that they wouldn't be uprooted until the end, because God doesn't want the spread of the gospel and the true Chrsitians to be hindered or harmed in any way.

Cult leaders are well defined as false Christs ( false Messiahs).


Many political figures of world history are well defined as 'false Messiahs' . Their various eras of their rising and their rule, have been filled with 'wars and rumors of wars.' Wars and rumours of wars have not always depended on the emergence of such people.

The words of Jesus:

Take heed lest any man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying 'I am Christ', and deceive many. And when you shall hear of wars and rumours of wars, do not be troubled, for such must needs be, but the end shall not be yet. For nations shall rise against nations, and there shall be earthquakes in diverse places, and famines and troubles; these are the beginnings of sorrows. But take heed to yourselves, for they shall deliver you up to councils, and in the synagogues you shall be beaten, and you shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, as a testimony against them. And the gospel must first be published to all the nations. And when they lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what you shall speak, for whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, speak it, for it is not you speaking, but the Holy Ghost. Now brother shall betray brother to death, and the father the son, and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death. And you shall be hated of all men for my names' sake, but he that endures to the end shall be saved. But when you shall see the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the prophet standing where it ought not, then let them that be in Judea flee to the mountains.....'

Jesus is clear here. As are the rest of the bible scriptures that specifically refer to 'the son of perdition', the 'man of lawlessness'. There will be false Christs ( false Messiahs) ( Jesus does highlight those who state that they come in his name) and 'the abomination of desolation' which will occur after the gospel is preached to all the nations.

(Compare the words of Jesus with the Thessalonians scripture.)


One commenter there makes the following suggestion:

.....the Roman empire had two branches; Europe and the Middle East: only one of those performs beheading that the Book of Revelation speaks about being the punishment for not accepting the 'mark'.

Many people who're into the 'historical view' refuse to consider that the history of Rome and Jerusalem, corruption in the Papacy and other aspects of four empire history which appear to correspond with Old Testament scripture prophecy may be relevant to the current futurist 'end time' discussions- that there is a suggestion from the Lord that there would be many 'false Christs', and at the end of times, prior to the return of the Lord Jesus, a 'penultimate false Messiah'.

Barack Obama is an obvious potential political antichrist figure to be observed very carefully. It's not a research breakthrough. Anyone who's failed to notice this about Mr. Obama is either fast asleep, submersed in problems to the extent they don't have time to check him out, distracted otherwise, or categorically refusing to examine his case with an open mind for whatever reason. And a great many are following him with great enthusiasm. Often blind enthusiasm.

'Historicist view' researchers have turned up some interesting discoveries about historical events and false Messiahs . However one branch of 'the historicist view' ( as outlined in this post) with respect to the 'son of perdition' appears to try to adapt the scriptures to fit a thesis in order to specifcally focus on condemning the whole of the Roman Catholic Church past and present. It seems steeped in Protestant Institution history and fails to take an objective overview.

During the course of its history Rome and the Catholic Church has been unfiltered and riddled with with politics, corruption, brutality, false gods, freemasonry, signs and symbols, etc.
The list is long and discussions are extensive.

Rome and the Catholic Church is not alone in that.

The New World order is being brought in by Barack Obama whose campaign resulting in his status as President Elect involved a catalogue of blasphemy. He is an obvious cult leader, an obvious false Messiah. He has falsely stated that he comes in Jesus' name on a number of occasions and he seems to be 'opposing and exalting himself over everything that is called God or that is worshiped'. It has been happening worldwide. A great many people worldwide are focusing their worship on Barack Obama.
Here, an article on 'the world's reaction to his win'. One of many.

'For all the saints' is widely thought to be one of the best hymns to come out of the Anglican Church, written by a genuine believer in Jesus .
'All the Saints'.
All born again believers in Jesus who love him and keep his commandments who Jesus is sure to bring safely home. It is sung in churches everywhere.


Monday, 22 December 2008

Enjoy your Christmas time


I am taking a break from blog writing now for the Christmas period. I have put a few additions into posts, relevant to interesting issues; scroll down.

If the whole Western business, the whole commercial Christmas effort gets you down, relax.

Not because Barack thoroughly intends to get rid of all previous states and culture traditions. ( He apparently does.)

Jesus was not born to us mid winter. When he was conceived in the womb of the virgin Mary it was probably mid winter, since he was probably born mid Autumn.

'And the angel said to her: Fear not, Mary, for thou hast found grace with God.

Behold thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and shalt bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name Jesus.

He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the most High; and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of David his father; and he shall reign in the house of Jacob for ever.

And of his kingdom there shall be no end.'


Here, a site page explaining the matter of Jesus' birth time in detail.

Mary and Joseph , at the time of Jesus' birth, were rejected by an indifferent, self absorbed world to the point Mary nearly had no where to give birth. No one would help them.
Not even when Joseph pointed out that Mary was about to give birth. They had to go knocking from door to door, everyone turned them down.

It must have been hurtful and bewildering.

Eventually, an innkeeper consented to lend them his stable.

The sort of response they were greeted with when in need might remind you of much of the world we live in today.

Throughout Israel there had been excitement over the coming of the Messiah to the point that Herod, the tyrannical political ruler, had been jealous and frightened about it. He did not understand the prophecies about Jesus and his mission. He was a tyrannical politician to the core.


He believed a 'King of the Jews' would come; he wondered what it all meant.


Jesus was born in a stable, as there had been 'no room at the inn.' Mary will have been carefully tended, and protected every moment by God.

After Jesus was born Mary tenderly placed him in a manger there. It will have been a little wooden one, filled with new, clean hay.

In Chapter 2, Verse 7, we read: "And she brought forth her first-born son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn."


The scriptures indicate that throughout the Old Testament era, satan tried to disrupt the advent of the Messiah. He did not want Jesus to be born to us.

As soon as Jesus was born, he did not want him to live.

He did not want him to continue to fulfill the promises, the prophecies.

The Son of God had come to earth in spite all satan's efforts to prevent it, all recorded throughout the Old Testament. satan knew his plans against the salvation of mankind would be forever defeated if Jesus fulfilled his ministry and mission on earth.

He started in straight away, as soon as Jesus was born, trying to attack the newborn baby Jesus and attacking others without scruple of any kind. Herod, in a tyrant's rage, sought to have every male infant under the age of two years old in Bethlehem killed.

The effort to annihilate Jesus failed; Mary and Joseph were warned. They knew the direction of the Lord because they put their faith in him.

.... behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him. When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt: And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.

Matthew 2.13

The little family were probably only a few days out of the little stable just before Herod's soldiers raged in and rampaged the place.

God's timing was perfect. The young couple left Bethlehem carrying Jesus; Mary on the back of a donkey. Mary must have been wide eyed, amazed, horrified at what Herod wanted to do. Horrified that anyone would want to destroy the baby Jesus. Horrified that her family had been threatened in such a way.

She knew what it was all about.

In her arms she held the saviour of the world.

She already knew her baby was the prophesied Messiah. She was living in prophecy fulfillment; all about her, she saw prophecy being fulfilled.

I wonder what she must have felt, riding out of Bethlehem.

The bible doesn't say whether Mary and Joseph knew exactly what Herod was planning in his effort to find and destroy Jesus. It looks like they didn't, at the time of escaping.

We are just told that Mary and Joseph escaped with baby Jesus, having been warned in a dream that Herod was seeking to kill Jesus.

And later they heard about what Herod had done, they must have done.

King James Bible
'In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and refusing to be comforted, because they were no more'.

Leaving Bethlehem there will have been security, peace and joy in Mary's heart as she held on tight to God.



"This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you.” ( Jesus.)

It is good to celebrate the coming of Messiah Jesus to the world and his perfect story.

I heard a song this time last year, a soul song, a spontaneous song a lady had recorded. It was a song about Jesus the healer, the Messiah, who came to earth to set us free and lift us as his friends.

Everyone who sincerely calls on the name of the Lord Jesus is heard, and set free.

Jesus describes himself 'I am the good shepherd, and I lay down my life for the sheep.' He said he was sent to 'the lost sheep of Israel.'

When a sheep goes astray, wanders out of the fold, the good shepherd will go far to get it, and bring it back.

From her song, it seemed as though this lady had been rescued from a situation through God's love.

It was a song expressing her love for him, her acknowledgment of him, and what he had done for her.

'Well hallelujah, Jesus'.

*******

How silently, how silently, the wondrous gift is given. So God imparts to human hearts the blessings of His heaven. No ear may hear His coming, but in this world of sin, where meek souls will receive Him still, the dear Christ enters in.

Sunday, 14 December 2008

Barack Obama and the 'Beasts of Revelation.'

Looking objectively at interpretations of the 'beasts of the book of Revelation' as they could be applied to Barack Obama and his announced 'New World Order.' Given all the discussions going on at present.

This interpretation (click) suggests that the first beast of the well known passage in the book of Revelation represents the emerging 'New World order', or 'global governance'. ( 'One world government'.) These authors quote the bible well. I refer here uniquely to the page linked which gives a good outline of the Revelation scripture beasts. ( I have not had time to observe the rest of the pages on that site. )

As ever, in all cases, depend on your bible, and a Christian Church you feel you can trust.

The 'first beast' , (the beast like a leopard, with feet like a bear) represents the New World Order or 'global government', according to the above link. That beast may represent the New World Order a little more:

'And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were the feet of a bear, and in his mouth the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed; and all the world wondered at the beast. And they worshiped the dragon which gave power to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying who is like him? Who can make war with him? '

...That beast might be suggestive of more aspects of different world governments and systems that stand in opposition to Christ that come together to form the 'One World Government' prophesied in the bible.
Also, the 'signs and wonders' that are not of God which are to emerge in the 'end times', according to the bible, surely suggest much more than just endless technology advancement; there is political achievement suggested, an ability to influence multitudes, etc. supernatural occurrences; perhaps much more.

The site linked above suggests that the 'New World Order' ( 'One world government') will come out of the people, it will be made up of a coming together of the people. These people may be represented by the 'sea' from which the 'beast' described in the bible emerges.

A coming together of the people to form a one world government entirely corresponds with what Barack Obama is advocating in his endless message in support of his 'New World Order':

"We are the ones we've been waiting for."

Barack Obama is not excluding the current world politicians from his 'we are the ones', 'we are the ones we've been waiting for' messages; rather, everyone is 'coming together as one' into his New World Order ( One World Government) as far as he is concerned. ( Except those who refuse to join in.)

One modern translation of the relevant bible scripture here: 14 Because of the signs he was given power to do on behalf of the first beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth. He ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived. 15 He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. 16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
18 This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.


If the first beast uniquely depicts the currently emerging 'New World Order', and Barack Obama is the one to enforce the 'mark of the beast', ( popularly thought to be the veri-chip), then Barack Obama is represented by the 'second beast' in the Revelation prophecies. He is then the 'beast with horns like a lamb', the 'false lamb' of the book of Revelation: and thus a false Messiah and a false prophet: ( the 'son of perdition' , commonly referred to as the 'Antichrist' man.) Possessed by satan, speaking like satan. 'Speaking as a dragon.'
Self adulating and blaspheming..

..'the one' who enforces the 'mark of the beast' and forces everyone to 'worship the beast.'

...'And he exercises all the power of the first beast before him, and causes the earth and all who dwell in it, to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. And he does great wonders, and makes fire to come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, and deceives all who dwell on the earth by means of the miracles that he had power to do in the sight of the beast, saying to them that dwell on the earth that they should make an image to the beast, which had been wounded by the sword, and did live. And he had power to give life to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, to receive a mark in their right hand or on their foreheads; and that no man may buy or sell, save that he had the mark , or the name, of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let he who has understanding count the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man; and his number is six-hundred threescore and six'.'

The bible states that the first beast of Revelation is 'wounded by the sword' and that its wound will be healed, which causes people to marvel.

Barack Obama has described America as 'wounded', and he is stating that America's 'wound' can be healed.

Barack Obama states that he intends to 'heal America' ( He said "heal the wounds of this nation") through the formation of the 'New World Order' and his political dealings , which, it is thought, may create a 'false peace' before terrible tribulation comes. ( It is thought his policies may cause tribulation on a global scale, and that he may attack Israel and the Church particularly.)

The components of the New World religion (the false religions and false belief systems that all come together to form one , a discussion here) that will apparently become a part of the 'New World Order' or 'Global Government' are possibly depicted in the picture of the 'beast like a leopard' with 'feet like a bear', in the bible.

Upon his many heads were the names of blasphemy.'(click)

People who will eventually receive 'the mark of the beast', a mark that implies the beast, on their foreheads. Or their right hand.

Barack Obama seems determined to amalgamate and develop the current practices of the world's false religion and false belief systems into one belief system through which people may worship 'the beast'.

According to scripture, many are going to worship 'the beast and his image' ( the 'image' of the 'first beast' described in the bible book of Revelation.) Many will be forced to. Many are going to willingly receive 'the mark of the beast or the number of his name.'

The act of worship of the 'first beast' will apparently happen through a progressive, developing 'New World Religion'.
The currently emerging 'New World religion' seems to be composed of extracts from false religions , self adulation and mutual reverence.
Barack Obama is its main advocate. He is being hailed by his followers and most of the media as an 'enlightened being.'

The Dragon, the first beast and the second beast are, by the interpretation above, a 'False Trinity' dominated by 'the dragon', satan.

Assuming that Barack Obama is represented by the 'beast with horns like a lamb', the current worshipful adulation of Obama and what he stands for that is going on is effectively adulating him while he is in the process of bringing in the 'first beast', (the New world order/one world government) . Adulating him while he is moving people to a point where they will think nothing of 'worshiping the beast and his image' or 'receiving the mark of the beast or the number of his name.'
There is the suggestion being made that some of the adulation of Obama that is going on is already worship of the 'first beast' as it emerges.

Both Revelation scripture 'beasts' are owned by satan who is being adulated as and when the penultimate false Messiah, the 'son of perdition' ( looking at Obama in the case) is adulated.

'Worship' is express devotion and praise in knowledge of what you're doing. Defined by some as 'Adoring acknowledgement.'

The above interpretation assumes that the 'son of perdition' ( popularly referred to in modern times as the 'Antichrist man' who is to appear on earth) is the one who will actively 'enforce the mark of the beast or the number of his name'. ( We are looking the suggestion that Barack Obama is that man here.)


Here are some Obama quotes relevant to the points made in this essay ( sorry they have to come through a McCain ad.)




Below, relates to points raised ( the author of this video below has come to a definitive conclusion about Barack Obama).



There is also the suggestion that the 'son of perdition', the 'Antichrist man', is depicted by the picture of the 'first beast'. Looking at Barack Obama in the case, this Revelation scripture interpretation equally suggests that he is a prime advocate of the emerging New World Order and New World religion, and a False Messiah.
By this interpretation the 'son of perdition' embodies, represents and heads up the New World Order ( World Governance) and all it brings. 'Upon his many heads were the names of blasphemy.'
This interpretation assumes that the the 'son of perdition', the 'penultimate False Messiah' , the 'Antichrist' man ( we are looking at Barack Obama in the case) is not the one to enforce 'the mark of the beast' or 'the number of his name', but that there will be another who will enforce it on his behalf.

Here is a link to an extended outline of the basis for the interpretation just above, ( the assumption that the 'son of perdition' is represented by the first beast).
This interpretation makes the dragon and the two beasts no less a 'False Trinity.'

There is also a suggestion being made that Barack Obama is merely the first beast's 'prophet' and heralds the penultimate 'False Messiah' figure, and therefore precedes the 'son of perdition', penultimate 'False Messiah figure' ( 'Antichrist') in some way, and that this figure has not yet appeared.

There is also the suggestion being made that Barack Obama is a false Messiah of no world significance; this does not seem at all plausible at this stage.

The past two thousand years history have made the reliability and dependancy of the Lord's word very clear. Jesus explained that there would be many false Messiahs and wars and rumours of wars, and a penultimate world significant false Messiah, who the apostles call the 'son of perdition.' The bible is accurate. There are quite a few contendors for part or definitive fulfillment of the prophecies about the 'beasts of Revelation' and there have been a number of antichrist dictators who have seemed to be chasing after the role of 'son of perdition'. Barack Obama is catching peoples' attention on account of his being a false Messiah about whom Chrsitians have stated that they have 'grave misgivings' who is head of the free world, and has called for a global government.


The coming veri-chip, the micro chip that can be implanted in a person's hand or forehead, thought to be 'the mark of the beast', which it is thought Barack Obama may enforce, or that someone may enforce on his behalf. Bear in mind Barack Obama's personalized and angry contempt for the book of Leviticus, which we've all seen:

Leviticus 19:28 'You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.'

There's an old saying: 'show me the seven year old and I'll show you the man.'


What is this "symbol" or "image", that the child Barack (then Barry) is wearing around his neck in the form of a medallion, encouraged by his mother? ( See photograph below.) This horrible thing he's wearing round his neck in the photograph below does not entirely resemble any of the signs of satanism or the advertised occult based signs of the 'New World Order' of the past. It could be seen as suggestive of its wearer's fostership by satan himself, it's ugly enough. Is it meant to be a face, or an image suggestive of devils ? Or both? It is particularly hideous.



From another perspective it could be seen as an amalgamation of past occult signs. Barack Obama is currently reported to often wear various suspect signs/symbols, apparently resembling signs of satanism, on badges and so on, ( all of them seem to have something of an original vent) and apparently these signs he wears are combinations of past satanist signs, by popular opinion. One he wore last year looks like the advertised strange long star that apparently represents satanism with a slight variation. He had apparently placed a strange face shape in the middle of it.

This much debated 'flair' of this man as to whom many have already come to a definitive conclusion (here), would seem to be in line with scripture prophecies about the end times, because the scriptures are thought to suggest that those who worship 'the beast and his image' will be subscribing to a 'world religion' which will amalgamate all past and contemporary forms of what amounts to worship of satan.

We've noticed how Barack Obama is displaying his 'flair' with regard to the American seal which he adapted for his purposes during the course of his campaign. This does tend to suggest that he feels that the New World Order that he is setting in place should have some sort of unprecedented 'image'.

There is a certain structure similarity between the new American seal he's suggested imposing on America and the free world, and the ghastly image on the medallion in the family photograph.



Posts: The top of the Mountain
The proposed New World religion


The 'Obama the Antichrist?' blog is very well edited and contains data on matters relating to the New World Order being put in place by Barack Obama and others.

n.b. Adolf Hitler's attempted world order had an associated 'image': the swastika. Though he was an extremely strong antichrist figure, Hitler was apparently not the possible penultimate 'son of perdition' , the penultimate 'False Messiah' depicted in the Thessalonians scripture, though he was obviously an extremely strong candidate. ( During his time many believed he was "the 'Antichrist". He was an antichrist dictator.) He did not achieve his aim of being head of the free world. He did not enforce the mark and the number described in the bible on the whole of the free world and neither did one member of his psychopath Gestapo. He did not achieve world domination; he was driven back.
He forced everyone he could force, to submit to his 'emerging new order' and its image. And many were willing participants in his psychopathic schemes.

The 'second beast' according to scripture excersises all the authority of the 'first beast' and to cause an 'image' or 'likeness' of it to be made. This image is given life and the 'power to speak' and also to 'pronounce the death penalty.'

' And he had the power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and to cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed.'

This is usually translated as implying that councils that represent an antichrist governance will obtain power to defend it and so put to death those who do not comply.

As previously stated: clearly, no one in their right minds today would think of Hitler as a Messiah figure, though while he was rising, he posed as one. As a solution to world problems. Germany thought of him as some sort of 'Messiah' to their desperate problems and the whole nation appeared to go mad, demonized in some way. Hitler quickly revealed himself as an authoritarian madman. He was recognized for the threat that he was and driven right back. ( Too late for a great many.)

Obama has been very artful at concealing his plans while he brings in 'the New World Order' just as his affiliates have been.

Barack is new i.e. he has publicly come to the fore over the last decade. His announced 'New World Order' ( One world government) is not in place just yet. You could say it was emerging, rising up out of a sea of people.

Looking at Obama as the 'son of perdition' and looking at the 'Global government' that he is proposing as relevant in the case, (looking at this possibility) it seems that a definitive 'beast's image' would notbe fully developed yet. An established 'New World Order ( One world government) isn't quite here yet. It's announced and on its way. The full veri-chip, popularly thought to be the 'mark of the beast' isn't quite here yet. It is not yet being enforced in support of an established 'New World Order' or ' World Government'.



Thursday, 11 December 2008

Shout to the Lord

My loyalty is to my Lord who went to the cross for me. My saviour, my Jesus.



'And it shall be in those days that whoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.' What amazing, merciful God.
'For God so loved the world, that he gave his only son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life.'

Monday, 8 December 2008

Barack Obama, his announced 'new world order', and the 'emerging new world religion'

The 'Alpha and the Oemga.' 'I am the Alpha and the Omega.' Jesus said. The first and the last.' 'The beginning and end of all things.'
The Church interprets this statement of Jesus to mean that the Holy Trinity, the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit, has always been God. Jesus did not suddenly begin to exist in Mary's womb or the stable there. In the New Testament, after Jesus' resurrection, the apostles explain Jesus the Messiah as 'having become human'. ( using their exact words). He was conceived in the virgin Mary's womb by a miracle of the Holy Spirit, and was born in a stable.
Jesus is God's son, he is God. The Holy Trinity are one.
Jesus' spiritual innocence and purity are perfect. He is the 'bright morning star.' He experienced childhood in human form and went on to experience adulthood in human form. His Spirit is the Holy Spirit, and always has been.

Here the prophet Isaiah.


New American Standard Bible
For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.'

Set to music.

The Old Testament scriptures, the living word of God, contain God's commandments. Jesus, the living word of God, emphasised compassion for others, loving the Lord God with all your heart, soul and mind, and your neighbour as yourself. This gospel is his. He demonstrated his genuine love for mankind in all his acts, including fulfilling scriptures that prophesied that sinless, he would go to the cross for us and take the penalty for sin that we might repent, put our faith in him, be acceptable to God, and have eternal life.
No other spiritual leader on earth has done anything like this. None have been sinless. ( Many Christian leaders do their best to follow in Jesus' footsteps and lead them on in Christ.)
Leaders of all false religions are sinners who demonstrate self adulation motives. Often political motives.
The dialogue the Lord Jesus gave his disciples at the last supper, given that he knew what was directly to come, evidences his perfect innocence. As does everything in the Old testament, everything else he did on earth, everything he continues to do following his resurrection.


Any attempt to adapt or negate Jesus and his teachings is a hollow sham. A counterfeit.

It is eing considered that this world is edging towards a 'New world religion' ( a false religion) that will support the announced 'New world order', in fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

This proposed new 'world religion', currently dominant in the West, consists of an elaborate humanism, a 'we, the people, have it within us to solve answer to the world's problems if only we all get together' ( an ethos that has often been exploited by dictators for political purposes) and a coming together of an apparent selection of teachings from religions that the God of the bible, the Lord, rejects entirely.

The emerging 'New World religion helps itself to some of Jesus' teaching without acknowledging him. ( Many false religions do this.) His instruction to show kindness and compassion in particular. It also suggests that 'mankind's common humanity' can be perfected if everyone gets together and ignores the full bible scriptures and Jesus.
This 'New World Religion' invites people to indulge in hollow self glorifying; it's a deception. In the light of thousands of years of human history, people are being invited to buy into the notion that they may by sheer effort of will emerge as love-filled sinless wonders and a solution to world problems. They are being told they do not need Christ.
The emerging 'new world religion' sets itself up as a 'more plausible solution' to human problems than the essential matter of man's need for repentance and the fact that Jesus went to the cross.

In an earlier post we looked at how the bible shows that one of satan's tricks is to put his false and deceptive ideas forward as a 'solution' to the problems he instigates.

The emergent 'New world religion' is an attempt to set a thesis and a religion up above Christ. Not one of these advocates of the 'new world religion' would lay down their lives for you.

Jesus did.

It is being given a fancy name, this 'new world religion': 'the golden rule.' An outline of one interpretation here. It is being promoted everywhere.


Here it is, the new 'world religion ethic', introduced by a woman who displays an angry vent, clothed in intellectualism.



She starts out with an attack; on 'fundamentalism'.
For anyone who knows Christ, 'fundamentalism' in respect of belief in the Holy Scriptures is not an aggressive word at all; it is simple belief in Jesus and respect for his beautiful Holy Spirit, it is belief in the full scriptures. The woman introducing the video above falsely betrays Jesus as an 'aggressive warmonger like the rest'. False. Jesus is Prince of Peace, Lord of correct judgement, with all the power of the Holy Spirit at his disposal. She goes on to recommend that compassion should be applied, but that Jesus should not be respected and believed in: that's too 'fundamental,' she suggests.

A deluded group then go on to pontificate about the concept of faith and promote their essential 'golden rule' which they elevate to deistic status.

Elsewhere you can see the 'new world faith' emerging in all its forms; various 'campaigns against extremism' incorporate a snide attack on full belief in Jesus the Messiah. There is nothing 'extremist' about faith in Jesus, who is 'Prince of Peace'.

Jesus is the 'author and perfecter of our faith' as Christians. He is the Messiah. The 'first and the last and the beginning and end of all things'.

The emerging 'new world faith/religion' that people are being asked to participate in promotes the philosophy of 'god in self'. It's nothing to do with having the Holy Spirit within as a gift from Jesus Christ in response to repentance and belief in him as Lord and saviour. Mankind are not sinners, the emerging 'new world religion' suggests; not children of the fall of Adam and Eve at all. It suggests that Satan never tempted us, and we never fell short of the glory of God. It proposes that 'Mankind is something of a warm, golden glow, if only everyone could somehow 'blend as one' and tap into one another's resources'. Men and women are 'gods in the making' who don't need salvation, it suggests. It encourages spiritual pride, it's antichrist.

It's main proponent is Barack Hussein Obama, who is looked to as its representative. He is being hailed a 'modern saviour' all over the place. 'An enlightened being.'

The scriptures advise that God's enemy satan is very adept at deceiving people into 'worshiping foreign gods' , and has spent thousands of years doing it. According to the bible, all 'worship of foreign gods' is worship of satan.

Scriptures advise on the spiritual origin of the emerging 'new world religion'. Christians everywhere are suggesting that it's 'satanic counterfeit.' It is.

The scriptures explain satan's defeat at the cross of Jesus Christ as follows: ( here's one scripture)

Hebrews 2:14-15 tells us: “Since then the children [that’s us, the children of God] share in flesh and blood [that is, we have physical bodies], He Himself [Jesus] likewise also partook of the same [a physical body], that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil; and might deliver those who through fear of death were subject to slavery all their lives” .

A command to satan to cease his activity 'in the name of Jesus' spoken by a born again Christian believer who loves Christ is what satan recognizes as his defeat in any given situation.

People from all religions are running to subscribe to the 'new world religion' ethos, afraid of looking as if they're not part of some sort of 'golden glow.' It's very vain.

The only people who won't have it, are 'fundamental Christians' (born again Christians who fully believe the whole bible) who wont sell out to anyone or any other faith. (Some professed Christians have sold out to the 'New world religion'; in doing so, they demonstrate they never knew or respected Jesus in the first place). The reason Christians who know Jesus won't sell out to anyone or any other faith is that they're born again, they know the Lord's love, they love the Lord Jesus. Jesus and his the Holy Spirit are essential their lives and they know the Holy Trinity is priceless. No one who's received the Lord's spirit will have anything to do with this 'New world religion'.

"Jesus said to her, "Every one who drinks of this water will thirst again, but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst; the water that I shall give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life." (John 4:13-14 RSV)

"On the last day of the Feast, the great day [i.e. the 8th day of The Feast Of Tabernacles], Jesus cried out and said, "If any one thirst, let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, 'Out of his heart shall flow rivers of living water.'" (John 7:37-39 RSV)

The righteous Old Testament Israelites (King Solomon, to name one) in the days of the Old Testament prophets refused to sell out.
The Heavenly Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, are not exchangeable for anything. Not to those who love the Lord. It's not negotiable.

It may be that under Barack Hussein Obama, Islam turns out to be a major component of this new, developing 'World Religion' under debate. Americans attempt to incorporate the Islamic traditions and ethos into into the emerging new religion.

People from all faiths except serious Christian faith are showing a willingness to subscribe to a 'new world faith' ethos, including many Muslims and Jews.

Currently extreme Arab and Islam terrorist elements ( Al Qaida ) act as if they won't adapt for anyone; then again, their strict religion, so called, has never been anything but a pretext excuse for violence. Under Barack Obama they may be prepared to deal in many ways in exchange for a promise from him to move in on Israel, including merging into a new religion.

Barack Obama has been proposing a 'Civilian National Security force.'

'Obama Youths', here, brainwashed to a significant extent, apparently in the military, ( military youth, a youth group, or some sort of 'behaviour correctional boot camp'?) swear allegiance to Obama and call him 'The Alpha and the Omega.' This is absolute blasphemy. Here, the words of Jesus of the book of Revelation, 'I am the Alpha and the Omega.'

Here, Obama was responding to suggestions that 'his record runs counter to Jesus' teachings', and the question of youth training he's seen and supervised in the past.

Mr. Keyes' comment, shown on the video above is totally inappropriate ( the suggestion that Jesus would 'vote in an election') and Obama shrewdly observed it. Straight away. Mr. Keyes apparently does not apologize for it. He makes some interesting points, be careful though, the guy's a politician as well.

Barack Obama states that his (purported) Christian faith 'not absolute.' And there are other statements. If you look closely he is in fact saying that Jesus is not King of Kings and not the absolute answer for our souls. It's very smooth, his attitude. He exposes himself from the outset though: saying 'If I had the opportunity to talk to Jesus Christ, I would ask him..etc.'

Every human person who puts their faith in Christ has the opportunity to talk to Jesus Christ. And it is not too late for anyone alive on earth to put their faith in him and speak with him. Ever. That's the miracle of the love of Jesus who died on the cross for us. It is never inappropriate for Christian believers to repent of their sins ; on the contrary, confession and repentance of sin are an essential part of a believer's life.



Barack Obama states that he went to Church for twenty years, ( it was a highly controversial and unusual one) and presumably he has come across teaching from a wide variety of Churches. Of course he has. And he states that he has read the bible. He never heard that a person can pray and talk to the Lord Jesus Christ?

Refusing to judge individuals who are caught in other faiths contrary to Christ ( and the Lord Jesus tells us not to judge anyone, a serious commandment that people seem to be forgetting all over the place) is one thing. Refusing to denounce a false Messiah is quite another.

Will Barack Obama denounce this song ? I don't think he will.

Have you noticed how Barack really struggles with pride/humility issues whenever he makes a pretence to Christian faith? He really slips up here.

He says he's ' very proud of his Christian faith'. (Say what?)

True Christians are not 'proud of their own faith', no. No. We are ever grateful that the Lord Jesus has saved us, we love him for giving us the opportunity to be in his Kingdom, and for his endless mercy and forgiveness, surely.

Jesus Christ, perfect in wisdom and humility, is the author and perfecter of our faith. Not us.

A scripture on Jesus' humility: 'But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name.'

( Christian author C.S Lewis points out that the first temptation satan usually offers a new Christian is the idea that he's done the Lord some big favour in allowing himself to be converted to Christianity . He also tries to get Christians to look down on other Christians who he invites them to think 'might not be up to standard'.
The truth is, Christians are righteous in God's sight due to the grace of God, due to accepting our need for God's forgiveness and putting faith in Christ. The tempter, satan, is full of sin and pride, the bible explains.
To point out that false Christians who stated that they were 'proud' of their own faith and views have at times been history's aggressive warmongers.)

A 'one world religion' adulating a false Messiah figure is not fully here, though there is much discussion about how it's on its way.The story of the prodigal son in the bible makes it very clear that that the Heavenly Father always wants people to come to their senses, leave the 'Kingdom of satan's destruction' and come home to him. His heart for adult sinners is well described in this song, 'Adam, where are you?':

'I don't care where you've been sleeping
I don't care who's made your bed
I already gave my life to set you free
There's no sin you can imagine that is stronger than my love
And it's all yours if you'll come home again to me'.

With its chorus

'The Father's voice is calling with an urgency we've never heard before
Come in from the darkness now, before it's time to finally close the door'.


This is the Father's heart for adult sinners as described in a song. The father's heart is perfectly illustrated by one of Jesus' parables.

Consider the Heavenly Father's heart for children and young people who are being brainwashed by this very serious false Messiah figure Obama who is soon to be head of the free world. Here, the words of Jesus on very young children specifically.

Mathew 19:14 'Jesus, however, said, "Let the little children come to me, and stop keeping them away, because the kingdom of heaven belongs to people like these." '

~~~~~~~

Mathew 7:13 "Go in through the narrow gate, because the gate is wide and the road is spacious that leads to destruction, and many people are entering by it'.

Anyone moving in on your free will as Barack Obama is doing with young people ( and this is very serious) and many more, will always move fast, giving you no time to reflect, and rain on you a barrage of propaganda and idealism, incase you think for yourself. And Obama is a slick fast mover. The fastest world politics has ever seen. His socalled 'upwardly mobile freeway' which he advertised on his site on election day, is no technological breakdown, as he says. No one else has managed to announce a 'New World Order' and pull it off with efficacity while all the world's politicians ran out after him. He is a false Messiah (who is about to become head of the free world). You've heard it before: 'that is the road to hell'.

There seems to have been a 'falling away' generally, in all the denomination Churches, over recent years, in keeping with the Thessalonians scripture.

The bible explains that insincere, merely professed Christians quit when the time is hard and those who really believe remain faithful to Jesus.

The parable of the wheat and the tares .

These 'end times' we are thought to be living in appear to be demonstrating the truth of the parable which applies on a global scale in the 'end times'.

One girl wrote this summer:

(Beware the wolf (in designer clothers). Christ is the only way
June 26th, 2008 11:27 am
Plain and simple, Obama preaches and supports “anti- Christ” teachings.......Hats off to Dr. Dobson for having the guts to expose Obama’s “fruitcake” view of Christianity and the Sacred Scriptures.
Obama has clearly demonstrated that his Christianity is “inclusive”, meaning 'Christianity is not what Christ teaches, only what people “think” it is'. Beware the wolf; Obama is one in designer clothing!


The outline of the current situation in respect of the libel campaign against me and the legal stuff (click).